WINNING MATTERS
Winning matters. Winning preserves freedom. Winning provides financial stability. Winning protects your interests.
We’ve been winning for nearly two decades.
Winning isn't a tagline. It's a way of life. Here's what we mean:
State v. Cross - 20232373
Our client was charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon after he shot a trespasser at the business he was working as a security guard. The State alleged that he used excessive force. At trial, the jury found our client not guilty of all charges.
United States v. Ledesma - 20-1549
Our client was charged with conspiracy to commit alien smuggling as well as alien smuggling. Our client denied having knowledge of the conspiracy and rejected the government’s proposed plea agreement. At trial, a federal jury found our client not guilty of all charges.
State v. Underhill - 2024015192
Our client was charged with domestic violence assault and disorderly conduct. A criminal conviction likely would have resulted in deportation, so our client had to win. At trial, a Scottsdale judge found our client not guilty of all charges.
State v. Woods - 20214456
Our client was charged with child abuse related to her adopted son. Our client was adamant that she did not abuse her son. At trial, we were able to show that the child’s injuries occurred at a daycare and that the daycare employees had lied to protect themselves. A Pima County jury found our client not guilty of all counts.
United States v. Fuller - 23-CR-907
Our client was charged with knowing access of child pornography. We filed a motion to suppress and a motion to dismiss. After a hearing on the motion, a federal judge dismissed all charges.
State v. Wilson - 20210844
The Attorney General’s Office charged our client with elder abuse and several financial crimes related to an older relative for whom our client had Power of Attorney. The case proceeded to trial and after less than 15 minutes of deliberation, a Pima County jury found our client not guilty of all counts.
State v. Mills - 2023000094
Our client was charged with DUI. The evidence showed that the officer could not have possibly seen the traffic violation which he alleged was the reason for the traffic stop. After an evidentiary hearing, the judge ruled that the officer did not have reasonable suspicion to make the traffic stop and dismissed all charges against our client.
State v. Hendrickson - 22-007856
Our client was charged with DUI. Evidence showed that our client told the officer that he did not want to answer any questions. Despite this invocation of his right to remain silent, the officer continued to ask for his consent to a blood draw. We filed a motion to suppress the blood draw. A Justice Court judge denied the motion, and we appealed to the Pima County Superior Court. A Superior Court judge reversed the lower court’s ruling and suppressed the blood evidence. The state later dismissed all charges.
State v. Baker - TR2022000066
Our client was charged with DUI. Our investigation revealed that the officer who stopped Mr. Baker, blocked him in prior to establishing reasonable suspicion. We filed a motion to suppress the results of the DUI investigation. After an evidentiary hearing, the judge granted the motion and the state dismissed all charges.
United States v. Garcia - 21-CR-1117
Our client was charged with possession of child pornography. Before he came to our office, he was considering pleading guilty to a ten-year prison term. We filed a motion to suppress the evidence collected during a search of his cell phone. After filing the motion, the government revised the plea, and our client entered into an agreement whereby he would be sentenced to 0 to 3 years.
State v. Younts - CR24-000376
Our client was charged with multiple domestic violence offenses. A conviction would have resulted in our client losing multiple professional licenses. A Pima County judge found our client not guilty on all counts.
United States v. Cano - 14-01505
Our client was charged with one count of transporting an illegal alien for profit and one count of conspiracy. Our client rejected a plea and proceeded to trial. At trial, the jury deadlocked (10 voted not guilty, 2 voted guilty). The judge declared a mistrial.
United States v. Garcia - 16-00928
The government charged our client with one count of possession with intent to distribute marijuana and one count of conspiracy. Our client rejected a plea offer. On the eve of trial, the government dismissed all charges.
United States v. Gonzalez-Ayala - 16-1151
Our client was arrested and charged with one count of importation of cocaine, one count of possession with intent to distribute cocaine, and two counts of conspiracy. We drafted a motion to suppress based on a violation of our client's Miranda rights. After we raised that issue, the government dismissed all charges.
State v. Grevenitz - 2013-2258
Our client was charged in an eight-count indictment with charges including money laundering, possession of marijuana for sale, and weapons misconduct. Our client rejected the plea and proceeded to trial. At the close of the State's case, we moved for a directed verdict and took the unusual step of drafting a written motion for directed verdict. The judge granted the motion and found our client not guilty of all eight charges.
Guerena v. Pima County, et al
Our client's husband was shot and killed by Pima County SWAT during the service of a search warrant. We investigated the conduct of law enforcement and filed a civil suit against the County and all the individuals involved. Ultimately the county settled the case for $3.4 million.
State v. Herrera - 15-072
Our client was charged with felony criminal damage and misdemeanor DUI. Our client opted to take his case to trial. Between the first and second day of trial, the State dismissed the felony criminal damage charge and reduced the DUI charge to reckless driving.
State v. Lanunziata
Our client was charged with one count of second degree murder after shooting another man in self-defense. All charges were dismissed pre-trial after we were able to show that the shooting was justified.
State v. Limon - 2011-0098
The state charged our client with one count of possession with intent to distribute marijuana. After investigating the case, we filed a motion to suppress the evidence recovered based on an unconstitutional stop of our client's vehicle and a violation of our client's Miranda rights. The judge agreed and granted our motion. The state appealed to the Arizona Court of Appeals. We represented our client on appeal and won again. All charges were dismissed.
State v. Naemark - 2014-4942
Our client was charged with one count of aggravated assault in a three count felony indictment. He rejected the plea and decided to take his case to trial. On the eve of trial, the state dismissed all charges.
United States v. Requena
Our client was held in immigration custody pending removal proceedings. We argued for and were successful in obtaining the lowest possible bond. The government appealed. We represented our client on appeal and our client won the case in the Board of Immigration Appeals.
State v. Richman - 15-517783
Our client was charged in an eight-count indictment alleging assault and imperiling of a minor. He rejected the plea and we prepared his case for trial. The state dismissed all charges on the eve of trial.
State v. Schrader - 2014-2797
The state charged our client with one count of aggravated assault. After the state refused to offer a probation-available plea, our client proceeded to trial. At trial, a Pima County jury acquitted our client of aggravated assault.
State v. Sobarzo - 15042895
Our client was charged with super extreme DUI. We filed a motion to suppress based off an unconstitutional stop of his vehicle. The state dismissed all charges.